Saving us from the Constitution

The Loose Cannon Libertarian

Scrambling to rewrite their gun laws after the US Supreme Court affirmed the right of individuals to bear arms (DC v. Heller), the District of Columbia Council voted to end the most restrictive antigun laws in the nation and replace them with new restrictions.

The new legislation, according to an Associated Press report, is designed to follow the letter rather than the spirit of the ruling: Handguns will be permitted but can only be used in the home for self-defense. They cannot fire more than 12 rounds without reloading, which the city of Washington DC oddly defines as “machine guns.” Effective self-defense is further sabotaged by rules requiring that all guns be unloaded, disassembled, or equipped with trigger locks.

Of course, exceptions have been made for police, FBI, US Marshals, Secret Service agents, the myriad other legal gun-toting bureaucrats such as Federal Egg Inspectors, and vicious criminals who never obey laws anyway.

(No mention is made whether the over-12-bullet ban applies to the six-guns used by matinee cowboys such as Roy Rogers, Gene Autry, and Hopalong Cassidy in their heyday. As every child of that era knew, their six-shooters could fire up to 27 times without reloading.)

However, muckraking investigative reporter Max Prober of BlabberCast News has been covering the Council closely. It seems that the councilcrats are determined to apply the same approach to other Constitutional rights that threaten the safety of District citizens.

In new legislation, free speech will be allowed in the District, but only if such verbal communication is used for self-defense in the home and consists of fewer than 12 words per sentence.

For example, if masked gunmen break in the front door, the homeowner may legally use a 12-word defensive response such as, “Don’t shoot me! You can take my stereo! I don’t have a…”

Rapid-fire speech that delivers up to 12 words without pausing for breath, as heard on television infomercials when selling potato peelers and electric nose hair trimmers, will be banned as “machine gun delivery.”

Freedom of the press, while acknowledged as a Constitutional right, will henceforth be handled in a similar manner. All reading material in excess of 12 words, including newspapers, magazines, libertarian polemics, operating instructions for electric nose hair trimmers, and brochures explaining self examination techniques for colorectal cancer must be unstapled, have cover locks like teenage diaries, or be kept in the bottom of locked birdcages.

Post-it notes and “Hello My Name Is” tags will be exempt from the new law.

Applying the same rules to freedom of religion is a bit trickier. The Ten Commandments and the Twelve Days of Christmas will obviously be legal, but prayer books and hymnals may have no more than 12 entries. The books of the Bible must be pared down to 12 or fewer to be legal. That means the Old Testament of the King James Version will end with 2 Kings while the New Testament will terminate at Colossians.

This will eliminate Revelation. While Christians will miss The Rapture, Bible control advocates point out that worshippers will be spared the fear of Apocalypse. Protecting people, after all, is the whole point of both gun control and canon control.

However, Bibles may be kept in the home for strictly self-defense purposes (if masked gunmen break in the front door the homeowner may legally pray out loud, “God help me! You can take my stereo! I don’t have a…”

Otherwise, they must have no loaded words, always be dissembling or secured with a bible belt.

Upon entering paradise, Muslim suicide bombers will be allowed no more than 12 virgins (as opposed to the promised 72) and Hindu scripture praising the one thousand names of God will constitute a capital felony.

Former gun-banners and fellow “living document” Constitutionalists hail the attempts by the DC Council to circumvent the Constitution as forward-looking, insightful, and progressive.

About the author Garry Reed is a longtime advocate of the libertarian philosophy of non-coercion that espouses personal autonomy and individual responsibility, civil rights and economic liberty, maximum freedom and minimum government. His website is


Robb's picture

Humerous coverage of a “NOT SO FUNNY” subject! D.C. should be taken to court again and again until they finally get it right!

What does D.C. not understand about “Shall not be infringed”?
There are laws made by inane people and then there are laws granted by God.